Which statement best describes a concise fact-checking workflow?

• A. Propose a personal interpretation of the claim without sources.
• B. Verify claim with primary sources, seek corroboration, assess source credibility and bias, check for corrections, and cite reliable sources.
• C. Quote social media posts as sole evidence.
• D. Post a request for others to verify without performing checks yourself.

Answer: (B)

A concise fact-checking workflow hinges on confirming claims with solid, traceable evidence and documenting the steps so others can verify the process. Verifying with primary sources provides direct, original data rather than secondhand interpretations. Seeking corroboration from independent sources helps ensure the claim isn’t relying on a single biased account. Assessing source credibility and bias points to who is providing the information and what influence might shape it. Checking for corrections keeps the conclusion up to date if new evidence emerges. Citing reliable sources makes the verification transparent and reusable by others. This approach is stronger than relying on personal interpretation without sources, quoting social media posts as sole evidence, or asking others to verify without doing any checks yourself.